Skip to content
ZeroHouse

ZEROHOUSE KNOWLEDGE

ZeroHouse Lab: Comparing Four External Wall Concepts

This Lab compares four assumed insulation variants, not four measured buildings. The owner-supplied 3D visual illustrates a layered assembly; it is not a specification for the calculation.

Purpose and shared assumptions

This extends the existing Lab 001. Assume a 0.25 m supporting layer with λ=0.70 W/(m·K), insulation λ=0.040, and surface resistances of 0.13 and 0.04 m²·K/W. These are demonstration inputs, not properties certified for the pictured wall.

Four variants

A uses 0.10 m insulation, B 0.15 m, C 0.20 m and D 0.25 m. Other inputs stay fixed to isolate thickness from material or structural changes.

Reproducible calculation

R=0.13+0.25/0.70+d/0.040+0.04; U=1/R. Round only displayed results. Joints, fixings and linear junctions are excluded.

Mass and thermal response

The supporting layer is unchanged across variants. R/U values cannot provide heat capacity or an overheating curve; those need density, specific heat, conditions and a time-dependent method.

Moisture and buildability

Increasing thickness changes reveals, eaves and fixings. Moisture assessment needs the actual assembly and boundary conditions; this formula does not provide it.

Junction risks

Coordinate thickness with window position, plinth, lintel and façade supports. Poor junctions can erode improvements in the clear-wall area.

No universal winner

D has the lowest U-value in this model, but the table does not assess cost, fire requirements, programme or payback. Selection needs a whole-building balance and construction checks.

One base → four thicknesses → R/U → junction reviewOne basefour thicknessesR/Ujunction review
ZeroHouse assessment diagram; not a construction detail.
Project review matrix
ItemParameterCheck / result
A: d=0.10 mR=3.027 m²K/WU=0.330 W/(m²K)
B: d=0.15 mR=4.277 m²K/WU=0.234 W/(m²K)
C: d=0.20 mR=5.527 m²K/WU=0.181 W/(m²K)
D: d=0.25 mR=6.777 m²K/WU=0.148 W/(m²K)
Owner-supplied three-dimensional cutaway of a layered external wall
Concept visual. The table uses separate assumed inputs.

Lab 001

What this means for your project

Use the table as a reproducible exercise. Replace all assumptions with verified project inputs and assess the complete detail.

Sources and scope of review

Checked: 2026-09-09. Editorial guidance; not evidence of compliance for an individual building.

Related reading

All guides in this topic · Individual house design

Open the calculator

Building envelope